FANDOM

Profiler10

Bureaucrat Admin
  • I was born on September 29
  • My occupation is Writer, College Student
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Is it possible we can have a private chat?

    And send me a private link, please?

      Loading editor
    Fashionable101
    Fashionable101 closed this thread because:
    Privacy.
    16:49, May 2, 2018
    • This reply has been removed
  • Hey man, it's been a while. I'd just like to report that ONCEFan has been reverting edits without explanation (including mine). Also Diego has been doing it again, and I saw that you warned him about it (and thanks for sticking up for me by the way). I talked to Echo about it, but he says I should just do it myself. But I figured you're much better suited for this kind of thing than me. Could you deal with it please? Thanks

      Loading editor
    • View all 20 replies
    • Hey Omni, thank you for adding the pictures to Cat's page. Page looks good.

        Loading editor
    • Oh no problem.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, Reese, how are you? How is everything? We miss you. A lot has been going on while you were gone. I read your message and I understand what you wrote. I understand when you said that I should leave you a message once there is a green bar next to your name, but there are few questions that I want to ask you now that you're back. So, I'm sorry that I am writing you a message in advance.

    1. Did you by any chance get to see the rest of Season 13 so far while you were gone?

    2. When you are back tomorrow, will you be able to finish where you left off with the delayed articles?

    3. The article of Michelle Gorman and her episode summary is complete and the episode summary for the article of Mitchell McCord is complete, but can you please whenever you have the chance to look at the two articles and see if there is anything missing like, grammar, missing details that need to be added and corrections?

    Please reply to my message whenever you have the chance. Thank you and it is great to have you back.

      Loading editor
    • View all 31 replies
    • Forgive me with what I'm about to say, Reese. But, whatever it is that you're going to tell me, if you're going to criticize me and give me a bad mouth, please don't. I am not in a mood because I feel bad and guilty already. You're right, you're absolutely right about what you said. It's my fault things got out of control. I crossed a line I shouldn't have and it only made things worse. I should have left you alone after our last conversation, but I didn't. Instead I chose to keep messaging you. I was a fool for doing something like that. You just came back and you need time. I realize that you can't do all the delayed articles done by Wednesday and you're two paragraphs away from finishing Jess Carney's article. Take your time and you are not in a hurry.

      Besides, we should all be happy that the season finale is airing on Wednesday because it is not the time to fight with each other, it is a time to enjoy about what is to come.  Let's just stick with the original plan. After the season finale finishes on Wednesday, then you are free to finish what you started. I think it's better that I don't bother you until after the season finale airs. On second thought, it's better that I don't bother you for a week. You know what to do and I trust you. The point is, I am so sorry.

        Loading editor
    • How are you? How is everything? It's been a week and a half since we last spoke and I'm sure you read my previous message. I meant what I said on my previous message and If I said something in my last message that might have hurt you then I'm sorry. When we last spoke, I crossed a line I shouldn't have and I'm sorry. You were right about what you said that you just came back and I hope it's not too late for the plan of finishing the work you started after the season finale airs. Can you please send me back a message whenever you have the chance?

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • .....so you going to edit?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Is everything all right? No one has heard from you for over a month and some articles are still delayed. Please respond whenever you have the chance.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi Profiler10; I'm Amanda with FANDOM's community development team! I'm just reaching out to let you know that I've submitted a request to create an app for this wiki. Let me know what you think about this. Thanks!

      Loading editor
    • Hi Amanda. First, I'm very sorry for my late response. I've actually been on hiatus recently, which means I haven't been active on my FANDOM account for a while. So my apologies again.

      And now to answer your question, I think it's a great idea. If there's anything I can do to help, just let me know and please update me if you get any news. I've spoken to a colleague and we just ask that if the app gets approved, that it has a background. I'm afraid I'm not very familiar with FANDOM apps so I have no idea what that means but otherwise, I can tell you that we are on board with the idea. Thanks for your time, Amanda and take care.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey Reese! Its been a month since we've last heard from you, so I leave this message for you. I completely understand that you've got priorities, obligations, and, well, another life outside of Wikia, but I've been worried about you since you haven't been active. I just want to be assured that you're okay and that everything is going well IRL.

    Not much has happened in the last month. Criminal Minds begins airing again on Wednesday, and we've been able to keep up the delayed articles. Only Michelle Gorman remains left but we'll try and update her soon.

    Respond ASAP!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello, Profiler10.

    Fashionable101 here.

    Anyway, I would like, with your and/or Echo Spy's permission to create Linda Barnes' page.

      Loading editor
  • Do I have permission to create and work on the article for Rafael Taveras? I already have an idea of write I'm going to write in it. 

      Loading editor
    • View all 19 replies
    • Rock8591 wrote: With all honesty, BAUmaster628 is the 2nd best person at writing full articles after UnSub-Zero. Sometimes it's better an average or just slightly above-average page than an ideal "best" page for a character. Considering how often pages get re-edited repeatedly, there oftentimes is no ideal piece of work as there's always room to improve anyways.

      Sorry but what is that supposed to mean? And this is directed at you Rocky not BAUmaster. I'm sorry that I haven't been able to do pages but I have a life and Unsub-Zero had no life so I'm sorry if I'm up to his "great" standard but I am doing my best! But in the end, it turned out he was making more problems than he was contributions which is why he's gone.

        Loading editor
    • No inferences against anyone personally...but there is no denying that UnSub-Zero had the best articles, BAUmaster a close second.

      Would not mind at all if the BAUmaster is in charge of character pages. I know he/she caught some flak in some other threads for creating pages but I can’t say I mind them so far. Just defending BAUmaster. Not against anyone in this thread, just some threads and sentiments in general recently.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Would you say any of the unsubs on the list below are omnivores (serial killers who, as Hotch stated in Omnivore, don't "have a specific victim type"). I wish to give you my reasons as to why I think they should be considered omnivores

    • Dale Schrader (killed each of his victims for various reasons)
    • The members of the Hitman Network and Tony Mecacci (Their victims were selcted by the people who hired them to kill said victims) 
      Loading editor
    • No, I actually had to check these before giving you an answer. The pathology does not apply when specific victims are targeted. For example, Foyet killed any couples he came across on the road (basing that answer on the opening scene of Omnivore). He didn't stalk or learn anything about his victims beforehand. He only did that later.

      It's my understanding that Schrader killed victims for specific reasons (e.g. the accomplice that sold him out or another who he paid to watch his hostages. She was killed to cover his tracks.) Now the hitmen are certainly not omnivores because THEY didn't pick their victims. Their clients did. Although the likes of Cat Adams may have twisted the dynamic for her own benefit, her victim selection was very specific: men willing to pay to have their wives killed so she can't be classed as one either. I think the category should only apply to killers who follow the show's usual structure, you know, abduction, torture/ritual, then kill and repeat but don't learn anything specific about their victims before striking. Does that description make sense to you?

        Loading editor
    • It does when you explain it

        Loading editor
    • Sorry for the late reply.

      I'm not going to lie. That was a good spot on your part. I wouldn't have thought of that connection. Anything else comes to mind just give me a shout.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message